Spam For The Sake Of Spam

Does Alex Jones live according to, “Spam for the sake of spam”?

Is the gist of American populism, “Spam for the sake of spam”?

Yet is spam popular, or even the slightest tasty?

Are Americans on the treadmill working off spam calories?

We can ask if spam is tasty and expect a wide range of American opinion in answer.

Some will undoubtedly answer tasty: very tasty, tasty, somewhat untasty, very untasty.

The question is phrased in terms of taste.

American populism holds, “”De gustibus non est disputandum”.

If some will undoubtedly answer tasty: very tasty, tasty, somewhat untasty, very untasty then taste indeed will not be disputed. Statistically, how could it be?

Spam is still to be found on popular American grocery store shelves. Spam finds a market year after year, day after day, hour ticking hour, hot cake dripping syrup, of varied flavor, dour.

Thus we find Alex Jones representing “De gustibus non est disputandum for the sake of De gustibus non est disputandum.”

I don’t know about you, but nevertheless I speak for you when I say I couldn’t stand it if Oscar also was a proponent of “spam for the sake of spam.”

Holy Moly.